Classification has become an essential component of Para Snow Sports, as it determines athlete eligibility and guarantees fair competition. Without this system, events would lose credibility, results would lack equity, and athletes would compete in situations that do not reflect their abilities. The International Ski and Snowboard Federation –FIS– has emphasized that classification is a cornerstone of Paralympic sport.
Beyond regulations, the process carries a significant human dimension. Sandra Titulaer, FIS Head of Classification, explained: “For me, the most difficult thing is telling someone who wants to be part of Para sport that they don’t meet the criteria.” She added that the other side of the system can be equally intense: “The most satisfying part is being able to tell them that they do belong, explain what class they will compete in, and help them build their career.”
Evaluation, a decisive step in an athlete’s career
The evaluation process includes in-room assessments, technical tests and, in many cases, an Observation in Competition Assessment during official events. Athletes are required to attend with their adapted equipment —prosthetics, braces or other aids— which forms part of the analysis. For many, the session represents an additional source of stress, as their sporting future may depend on it.
Classifiers also take into account factors such as special glasses or other adaptations that directly affect performance. In the case of minors or athletes with intellectual impairments, regulations require the presence of a representative from their National Federation. The entire procedure is conducted under strict protocols of medical confidentiality and cultural sensitivity.
A system with oversight and protest mechanisms
The FIS has established a formal protest mechanism for cases where a federation believes that a classification has not been conducted correctly. These requests must be formally documented, citing the relevant regulations, and are reviewed by the Chief Classifier.
“We want the sport to be fair — that’s it,” said Gülcin Seyhan, FIS Para Snow Sports Classification Coordinator. She explained that the ability to protest “exists to ensure fairness, transparency and the protection of athletes’ rights when classification decisions are believed to be incorrect.”
Challenges and future perspectives
Despite progress, challenges remain in terms of public perception of the system, as some athletes and coaches still express reservations about the role of classifiers. Cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as the management of sensitive medical data, represent additional difficulties in an increasingly international environment.
In parallel, the FIS has confirmed that it will invest in research through 2028 to improve the accuracy and fairness of classification. The international body highlights that this commitment is aimed at strengthening the confidence of athletes and federations, consolidating classification as a fundamental pillar in the structure of Para Snow Sports.
