The recent exclusion of karate from the Paris 2024 and Los Angeles Olympic Games has left athletes and enthusiasts reeling. Despite being included as one of the five additional sports in the Tokyo 2020 Olympics —following a proposal from the organizing committee— karate was dropped from the Paris Summer Games before the Tokyo Games, which had been delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The subsequent decision by the Los Angeles organizing committee to also exclude the sport has only compounded the disappointment.
This exclusion is particularly disheartening for those who appreciate karate’s global reach and inherent beauty. Despite its widespread popularity, the sport has failed to achieve the recognition it deserves. Under the leadership of Antonio Espinós since 1998, the World Karate Federation (WKF) has faced criticism for its lack of accountability and its failure to create an environment conducive to effective leadership. The WKF’s power structure has ensured that presidential positions at both the global and continental levels remain uncontested, with no competitive elections taking place. This lack of competition has hindered the sport’s growth and development.
Ver esta publicación en Instagram
THE PRESIDENT OF WKF MUST TAKE RESPONSIBILITY
Espinós, who also serves as president of the European Karate Federation, has been at the center of these controversies. The exclusion of karate from the Paris and Los Angeles Olympics raises concerns that the sport might also lose its place in continental competitions. Additionally, internal conflicts, such as the dissolution of national federations and the recognition of other groups based solely on their alignment with Espinós’s policies, have adversely affected the motivation of karate practitioners and coaches.
An examination of the WKF statutes reveals a troubling history of aggressive policies following its IOC recognition, initially supported by Juan Antonio Samaranch. Articles 21.9 and their subsequent expansions into Articles 6.3 and 8.2 created a significant divide between Olympic and non-Olympic karate, impeding unification efforts for years. Although these provisions were removed from the WKF statutes about a year ago, the damage had already been done. Many generations of karate practitioners saw their Olympic dreams dashed, leading to their withdrawal from the sport.
In response to its Olympic exclusion, the WKF shifted its focus by transforming the Karate 1 Leagues into a qualifying platform for the World Championships. However, this move has exposed significant disparities in global participation. Beyond a few African countries and a handful of nations in the Americas, many countries in these regions struggle to compete in the Karate 1 Leagues. Even those that do often face a lack of competitors in various categories, indicating that the needs of national federations in these areas may not be a priority for the WKF.
KARATE IS IN URGENT NEED OF A REFORME
The WKF’s approach highlights a broader issue: while the federation has made significant changes, the impact on karate’s global development and inclusivity remains uneven. The sport’s future in major international competitions depends on addressing these disparities and fostering a more inclusive and collaborative environment.
It is clear that karate is in urgent need of a unified and reformed management structure. This overhaul must ensure the appointment of qualified individuals to leadership positions within both the World Karate Federation and the continental federations, with complete transparency in the process. As karate seeks to rebuild and reclaim its global status, it is essential for the WKF to adopt a governance model that emphasizes fair competition and broad representation. Only through these measures can karate hope to inspire future generations and achieve the recognition it rightfully deserves.
