Real Madrid demanded the immediate resignation of Javier Tebas as president of LaLiga and vice-president of the Royal Spanish Football Federation (RFEF), in a new episode of confrontation between the Spanish club and the country’s leading football organisations. The request, published in an official statement on 16 October 2026, follows remarks by Tebas comparing the communication methods used by Real Madrid’s management to propaganda techniques associated with Joseph Goebbels, the Nazi Germany Minister of Propaganda. The dispute goes beyond the controversy surrounding those comments and once again places institutional neutrality, refereeing management and relations between the main stakeholders in professional football at the centre of the debate.
The day also brought significant developments in disciplinary proceedings. The RFEF Appeals Committee rejected Real Madrid’s appeal against the four-match suspension imposed on Vinícius Júnior, a decision that keeps the Brazilian forward out of the upcoming Clásico unless a further challenge is successful. Meanwhile, the RFEF announced that it would appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) against the sanction imposed by FIFA following Islamophobic chants during the friendly match between Spain and Egypt in March. These are three separate proceedings, but all reflect the institutional and disciplinary tensions affecting Spanish football.
Real Madrid demands Javier Tebas’ resignation over his comments about the club
The latest dispute was triggered by Tebas’ remarks about Real Madrid’s communication strategy and the refereeing coverage provided by its official television channel, Real Madrid TV. The LaLiga president argued that the club selected specific incidents, repeatedly raised complaints and fuelled suspicions about refereeing decisions. To describe this approach, he referred to propaganda methods used by Goebbels. Tebas clarified that his comparison concerned communication techniques rather than Nazi ideology or Real Madrid supporters. Nevertheless, the club considered that this clarification did not diminish the seriousness of comments it regarded as offensive and incompatible with the responsibilities of an institutional leader.
In its statement, Real Madrid said Tebas’ comments represented another episode in what it considers a pattern of attacks by the LaLiga president against the club, its management and its media outlets. The club also linked the controversy to the Negreira case, questioning the institutional response to payments made over several years by FC Barcelona to José María Enríquez Negreira, the former vice-president of the Technical Committee of Referees. Real Madrid stated that it had approached UEFA directly to seek clarification and called for reforms to the refereeing and football governance structures. Against this backdrop, the club demanded Tebas’ departure from both positions, arguing that his conduct demonstrated a lack of neutrality and impartiality. These claims reflect the club’s stated position and do not, in themselves, constitute a ruling on the LaLiga president’s conduct.
Tebas responds to Real Madrid as the dispute opens a new institutional front
Tebas responded on 16 October. The executive accused Real Madrid’s leadership of attempting to damage the domestic competition through a narrative that, in his view, was distorted by media outlets linked to the club. He also described the Madrid club’s response as a form of intimidation and argued that calls for his resignation were not new, noting that he had faced initiatives and complaints challenging his position during his years at the helm of LaLiga. His remarks indicate that, for now, the dispute remains in the public and institutional arena, with both sides defending opposing positions on the conduct and responsibilities of the league’s president.
Tebas was re-elected in 2023 for a term running until 2027 and has served as LaLiga president since 2013. Real Madrid’s demand does not, in itself, remove him from office or establish that a formal procedure to dismiss him from either position is underway. The dispute’s development will depend, among other factors, on possible responses from LaLiga’s governing bodies, the RFEF and other professional clubs. It will also be important to see whether other teams publicly support Real Madrid’s demand or whether the controversy remains confined to the relationship between the two parties. For now, the call for resignation remains Real Madrid’s official position, while Tebas continues to perform his institutional duties.
Appeal rejected as Vinícius Júnior’s four-match suspension stands
Alongside the institutional dispute, the RFEF Appeals Committee dismissed Real Madrid’s appeal against the four-match suspension imposed on Vinícius Júnior. The ruling upholds the punishment issued by the Disciplinary Committee following the Brazilian forward’s sending-off in the league match against Villarreal. According to the disciplinary ruling reported by EFE, two matches relate to pulling Nathan Saliba’s hair while the ball was in play but not being contested between the two players. The other two stem from the forward’s conduct towards the referee after receiving the red card.
The decision means Vinícius will miss the league matches against Sevilla, Barcelona, Racing Santander and Valencia, unless the suspension is amended by a higher authority. His absence from the Clásico on 25 October is particularly significant given the match’s sporting and media impact, although the disciplinary situation could still change if a further challenge succeeds. According to reports published on 16 October, Real Madrid intends to take the case to Spain’s Administrative Court for Sport (TAD) in an attempt to overturn the decision. As of this update, there has been no confirmation that the appeal has succeeded or that a ruling suspending the sanction has been issued.
RFEF to appeal FIFA sanction over anti-Muslim chants to CAS
The third development concerns the Spanish national team and the sanction imposed by FIFA over Islamophobic chants during the friendly against Egypt played on 31 March 2026 at RCDE Stadium, near Barcelona. During the match, which ended in a goalless draw, a section of the crowd chanted, “Anyone who doesn’t jump is a Muslim.” The incident was publicly condemned by Spanish international Lamine Yamal, who described the behaviour as disrespectful and intolerable. FIFA considered the chants discriminatory and sanctioned the Spanish football federation.
The sanction includes a fine of $20,000 and the closure of at least 15% of the available capacity at Spain’s next home friendly, with the possibility of allocating the restricted area to families, students and anti-discrimination organisations. The RFEF maintains that it acted immediately, reported the incidents to the match officials, cooperated with the authorities and took steps to prevent the chants from recurring. It also considers the sanction excessively severe in light of its response during the match. After its appeal to FIFA was rejected, the federation announced that it would take the case to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). The announcement confirms its intention to continue the legal challenge, but does not establish that the proceedings have already been formally filed or that the disciplinary measures have been suspended.
Last related articles
