Saudi Arabia is considering dropping five stadiums from its 2034 World Cup construction programme, according to an investigation published by ‘Semafor’ on 14 October. The Public Investment Fund -PIF- is preparing a restructuring that, without replacement venues, would reduce the tournament’s planned stadium count from fifteen to ten. The proposal raises a question for the Fédération Internationale de Football Association -FIFA-: its published requirements stipulated a minimum of fourteen suitable stadiums. No official approval of the reduction has been announced, and the outlet’s sources say the plans could still change.
The bid that secured hosting rights in December 2024 proposed fifteen stadiums across five cities: Riyadh, Jeddah, Al Khobar, Abha and NEOM. That programme remains on the official website and comprised four existing venues to be refurbished, three under construction and eight planned new builds. Dropping individual projects and reducing the final number of stadiums are different decisions: replacements could be proposed, but no approved alternative programme has been announced. The question is how the hosting conditions assessed when the tournament was awarded would be maintained.
Five projects under review
The potential cancellations identified by ‘Semafor’ are the NEOM, King Abdullah Economic City, Qiddiya Coast, ROSHN and New Murabba stadiums. All appeared in the original bid, and several are linked to property developments where work has slowed or stopped. The outlet links the review to PIF spending adjustments and says the fund and the Ministry of Sport did not respond to its requests for comment.
NEOM had already been the subject of an earlier investigation. On 4 October, ‘Reuters’, citing sources familiar with the project, reported that its stadium had been shelved indefinitely following changes to The Line development. The Saudi authority responsible for the World Cup responded by highlighting construction progress, without specifically clarifying that venue’s future. Other projects continue: Aramco Stadium in Al Khobar has published progress images through September and retains its planned 2026 opening. That progress means the review cannot be interpreted as a general halt to the tournament’s infrastructure programme.
What FIFA can change
The 2034 requirements document states that every bid must propose at least fourteen suitable stadiums, with different capacity requirements depending on the tournament stage. It also says its requirements form part of the legal hosting framework and constitute binding obligations. However, it specifies that it provides an overview and that a final version will follow. Fourteen remains the documented public minimum; no FIFA authorisation to reduce it to ten has been identified. Assessing any change requires knowing the requirements ultimately applicable and the procedure used to approve it.
Fewer venues could reduce investment and avoid stadiums with limited use after the tournament, but would also concentrate the demands of hosting. A smaller stadium roster would require reviewing match allocation, pitch recovery intervals and the capacity of transport, security and spectator services. The implications would depend on the schedule and the characteristics of the remaining venues; they do not establish that ten stadiums would automatically be unworkable. The institutional assessment must distinguish between simplifying designs or replacing projects and accepting a reduction in the required number.
Financial adjustments and hosting commitments
According to ‘Semafor’, Saudi officials are preparing a revised proposal to submit to FIFA. Maintaining the number through alternative venues, developing less complex facilities or requesting changes to the requirements are possible scenarios, rather than announced decisions. The governance question is what technical and financial justification would accompany a change and how its compatibility with the original commitments would be explained. Revising the programme does not, in itself, constitute a breach, but accepting different conditions would require clarity on what changes, who authorises them and how delivery capacity is assured.
The 2027 Asian Cup provides a nearer-term reference point for some venues, including Aramco, although its situation must be assessed separately. The organising committee reaffirmed on Friday that preparations remain on schedule despite regional security concerns. Those concerns do not establish the cause of the potential 2034 cuts. For the World Cup, the decisive information will be the formal stadium programme, any alternatives it includes and FIFA’s response: these will establish whether individual projects are changing or whether the requirements underpinning the award of hosting rights are changing too.
Last related articles
