IOC deletes IBA from National Olympic Committees: why it’s the turning point for Olympic boxing
Farzad Youshanlou
October 4, 2024

In a dramatic move that has sent shockwaves through the sport community, the International Olympic Committee with an Official Letter sent to all NOCs dated 30/9/2024, has officially severed ties with representatives of the International Boxing Association, effectively ending its longstanding role in overseeing Olympic boxing. This decisive action follows years of escalating concerns regarding the IBA’s governance and transparency, resulting in the association losing its voting rights and recognition within National Olympic Committees. Consequently, the IBA and its members National Federations are now barred from participating in the Olympic movement.

While boxing has remained on the Olympic program, it is now under the direct oversight of the IOC. This shift stems from ongoing issues within the IBA, particularly under the controversial leadership of President Umar Kremlev. However, the IOC’s support comes with a serious caveat: if the international boxing community fails to agree on a consensus to establish a new boxing governing body by early next year, the sport will be excluded from the Los Angeles 2028 Olympic Games.

This decision culminates years of unresolved concerns related to the IBA’s governance, transparency, and financial integrity. A primary source of worry has been the IBA’s close ties to Russian state-run entities, especially following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The IOC has repeatedly expressed alarm over the IBA’s inability to distance itself from these influences, raising questions about the organization’s independence and its capacity to govern the sport impartially. Any serious efforts made by management in the past to bring about internal changes were opposed by the administration, resulting in the situation remaining largely unchanged, much like it was under AIBA. The current state of affairs cannot serve as a viable operating plan for a major Olympic sport like boxing.

THE IBA’S FAILURE

Kremlev’s leadership has been plagued by allegations of political interference, poor governance, and financial mismanagement. The IBA’s lack of transparency in its operations, alongside ongoing issues of corruption in refereeing and judging at major competitions, has severely undermined its credibility. Despite multiple warnings from the IOC and opportunities for reform, the IBA’s failure to address these problems has led to this decisive action by the Olympic governing body.

In a statement following the IOC’s decision, Kremlev had remarked, “As for the IBA, we will continue to provide the best conditions for our boxers worldwide and will keep working hard to ensure that our sport thrives. We are open to establishing communication with the new IOC leadership as soon as they are elected, for the sake of our boxers and the sport’s Olympic future.” However, Prince Feisal Al Hussein, one of the seven candidates in the recent IOC elections, completely denied any collaboration with IBA in future.

THE END OF AN ERA

The removal of IBA representatives from National Olympic Committees signifies a pivotal moment for boxing, a sport that has been part of the Olympics since 1904. It sends a strong message from the IOC that no sport, regardless of its historical significance, is exempt from the repercussions of poor governance.

For the IBA, this decision could have been averted had the organization taken meaningful steps to reform and address its longstanding internal issues. Instead, its failure to meet the IOC’s standards has resulted in its complete exclusion from the Olympic framework.

BOXING’S FUTURE IN THE OLYMPICS

However, the removal of the IBA does not equate to the end of boxing’s Olympic journey. The IOC has reiterated its commitment to the sport, emphasizing that its administration must now be free from the governance challenges that have marred its reputation.

With the Paris 2024 Games now concluded, the focus must shift to ensuring that boxing is governed in a way that upholds the values of fairness, transparency, and integrity that the Olympic Games represent. Many in the boxing community hope this marks the beginning of a new era, one where the sport can thrive under improved leadership.

This decision also raises broader questions about the future of elite boxing beyond the Olympics. With the IBA now excluded, national boxing federations and athletes are left seeking guidance on the sport’s next steps. The IOC has made it clear that it is looking for a new, credible international governing body to partner with, but it has not endorsed any specific organization.
Currently, World Boxing is the only alternative on the table, but questions remain about its capacity to effectively lead international boxing. Does World Boxing have the necessary structure and vision to unify the sport globally? Is its leadership capable of gaining widespread support? These issues must be addressed swiftly, as the IOC’s deadline for forming a new governing body is set for early 2025. Whatever solution emerges, it will need to be implemented both quickly and responsibly to ensure boxing’s future in the Olympic Games.

Latest News