The Olympic and Paralympic Games, despite their challenges, remain the world’s most prestigious and widely watched sporting events. Every four years, these monumental gatherings unite tens of thousands of athletes, coaches, and officials from across the globe, celebrating athletic excellence on an international stage. With the eyes of the world upon them, the Games have become a showcase of talent, teamwork, and national pride.
[What Milan Cortina 2026 has learned from the Paris 2024]
Carefully chosen host cities set the stage for these historic competitions, governed by strict protocols from international sports federations. Every detail, from qualification criteria to the rules governing each sport, is designed to maintain fairness and uphold the integrity of the events. Yet, as with any global spectacle, the Olympics and Paralympics are not without controversy.
[Why China has dominated the Paralympic Games for the past 20 years]
Over the years, the Games have faced issues that have threatened to tarnish their spirit. Doping scandals have raised questions about fairness, while athletes switching nationalities — sometimes for strategic or financial reasons — have become a point of contention. More recently, debates surrounding gender identity, particularly concerning athletes who have transitioned, have introduced complex discussions about inclusion and fairness in the future of sports.
Ver esta publicación en Instagram
Despite these challenges, the Olympics and Paralympics continue to captivate audiences worldwide. The chance to win a medal on this grand stage remains the ultimate goal for athletes, many of whom dedicate years, if not their entire careers, to reaching this pinnacle of achievement.
THE BIG DEBATE
Yet, one debate has persisted as long as the Games themselves: how should we value these medals, and how should they factor into the ranking of participating nations? Should a country with more gold medals outrank one with a higher overall medal count, or does total medal haul better reflect a nation’s sporting success?
Supporters of ranking by gold medals argue that these represent the pinnacle of athletic achievement. To them, a nation with the most golds has the highest number of champions, and this should be the determining factor in how teams are ranked. This system emphasizes the ultimate victory, reinforcing the belief that excelling in a few key events is more prestigious than consistently placing across many.
THE VALUE OF A SILVER AND BRONZE MEDAL
However, others believe that ranking by total medal count — including silver and bronze — better reflects a country’s overall success. For these proponents, winning across a broad spectrum of sports demonstrates athletic depth and sustained performance, showcasing a nation’s competitiveness on a larger scale. This approach values the collective achievements of a country’s athletes and their ability to compete at the highest level in various disciplines.
Both perspectives have merit, and the debate continues to spark passionate discussion. The question boils down to what values are prioritized: pure excellence and domination at the highest level, or broad-based success and consistent competitiveness across multiple sports?
This debate is not just about numbers on a leaderboard. It touches on issues of national pride, global influence, and the legacy of athletes and nations. For smaller or emerging countries, even a single medal can be a transformative moment, bringing immense pride and a sense of accomplishment that resonates far beyond the podium.
As the Olympic and Paralympic Games continue to evolve, the discussions around the value of medals and how to rank nations will undoubtedly persist. But whether the focus is on gold, silver, or bronze, one truth remains clear: the pursuit of excellence on the world’s greatest sporting stage is a universal endeavor. The Olympic and Paralympic spirit endures, reminding us that, despite the controversies and complexities, the Games showcase the best of what humanity can achieve.
